Territory v. Anduha
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
BANKS, J.
(Perry, C. J., dissenting.)
This case involves the constitutionality of Act 256, L. 1929. The Act is as follows: “Any person who shall habitually loaf, loiter and/or idle upon any public street or highway or in any public place, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and upon conviction thereof be punished by a fine of not more than one hundred dollars, or by imprisonment for not more than one year, or by both such fine and imprisonment.”
On the 10th day of August, 1929, Camelio Andulia was charged in the district court of Honolulu with a violation of this statute in…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pinkerton v. VerbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- City of St. Louis v. GlonerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. TaylorHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
- City of Portland v. GoodwinOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- State v. AbellanoHawaii Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. BlossHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. ShigematsuHawaii Supreme Court · 1971
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.