Legal Opinion
State v. Shigematsu
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided April 7, 1971No. 4989, 4990PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*605OPINION OF THE COURT BY
ABE, J.
The defendants were originally charged in the district court with the violation of HRS § 746-61 because they “were found present in a room or place barred, or barricaded, or built, or protected in a manner to make it difficult of access or ingress to police officers where gambling implements were exhibited or exposed to view.”
The district court denied the defendants’ motions for dismissal in both cases and upon demands for jury trial, the cases were committed to the Circuit Court of the First Circuit for jury trial. Prior to jury trial, both cases were…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Shelton v. TuckerSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Patricia Johnson Michael Au France v. City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- State v. KaneakuaHawaii Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
- Myron Dennis Behm, Burton J. Brooks, Bobby Lee Langston, David Leon Brodsky, Jeffrey R. Olson, and Geoff Tate Smith v. City of Cedar Rapids and Gatso USA, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- State v. BlossHawaii Supreme Court · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.