Legal Opinion

Pinkerton v. Verberg

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1889PublishedCited by 64 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo. (Buck, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This action is brought by plaintiff to recover damages for assault and illegal arrest. Defendant, at the time of the arrest, was a policeman of the city of Kalamazoo, and claims to have arrested plaintiff because she was a street-walker.

It appears that plaintiff lived on Kalamazoo avenue east, and sometime in the forepart of August, 1888, went from her own homo to a sister’s, living on the corner of Church and Eleanor streets, in the city. There she met a younger sister, and the two went down into the city upon the main street; called into the Watkins House closets; and after plaintiff had…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re WayMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Quinn v. HeiselMichigan Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Sitz v. Department of State PoliceMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  2. City of Seattle v. DrewWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. City of Chicago v. MoralesIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Commonwealth v. CarpenterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1950
  5. Territory of Hawaii v. AnduhaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API