Legal Opinion
State v. Bloss
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided December 17, 1981No. 7440PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*149OPINION OF THE COURT BY
OGATA, J.
The State of Hawaii (hereinafter State) appeals an order and a written decision of the First Circuit Court which declared Section 26-6.2(b)(7), Revised Ordinances of Honolulu (hereinafter R.O.H.) as amended,1 unconstitutional as being violative of the guarantee of free speech, and being void for vagueness in violation of due process of law. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm in part and reverse in part the decision of the circuit court.
Section 26-6.2, R.O.H., regulates peddling on streets, sidewalks and malls, and in other public places. That ordinance…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Cammack v. WaiheeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- B.H. v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- State v. NewmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. KamHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
- Tauese v. State, Department of Labor & Industrial RelationsHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.