Consumer Cause, Inc. v. Johnson & Johnson
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARMSTRONG, J.
This is a Proposition 65 (Health & Saf. Code, § 25249.5 et seq.) 1 case brought by a private organization called Consumer Cause, Inc., against a number of manufacturers of stainless steel surgical stents and similar implantable surgical devices. 2 The complaints alleged that the devices were composed of nickel and nickel compounds, chemicals known to the state to cause cancer, and that the manufacturers had failed to warn consumers of the exposures, thus violating section 25249.6, which provides that “[n]o person in the course of doing business shall knowingly and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- California Water & Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- California State Automobile Ass'n. Inter-Insurance Bureau v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Santa Monica v. StewartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Wilson v. Los Angeles County Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Wilson & Wilson v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Association of Irritated Residents v. Department of ConservationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Ebensteiner Co., Inc. v. Chadmar GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Cuenca v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Consumer Defense Group v. Rental Housing Industry MembersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.