Legal Opinion

State v. Scott

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 24, 1954No. 434PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, C. J.

The bill of indictment fails to meet the test set forth in S. v. Sumner, 232 N.C. 386, 61 S.E. 2d 84, and other decisions of like import. Tbe allegations in a bill of indictment must particularize tbe crime charged and be sufficiently explicit to protect tbe defendant against a subsequent prosecution for tbe same offense. Tbis tbe bill of indictment appearing in tbis record fails to do. S. v. Morgan, 226 N.C. 414, 38 S.E. 2d 166; S. v. Cochran, 230 N.C. 523, 53 S.E. 2d 663.

While a motion to quash is tbe most appropriate method of raising tbe question whether tbe bill of indictment charges tbe…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. . MorganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. State v. CochranSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. State v. ThorneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. State v. RaynorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  5. State v. SumnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. HammondsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. State v. StokesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. State v. RussellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  5. State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API