State v. Raynor
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBaeNhill, J.
In the first count in the warrant, defendant is charged with the commission of the offense condemned by G.S. 14-335, a public-local statute applying to Washington and certain other counties. The charge is laid substantially in the language of the statute and is sufficient to repel a motion in arrest of judgment. S. v. Jackson, 218 N.C. 373, 11 S.E. 2d 149, 131 A.L.R. 143.
Exception to the judgment presents the single question whether the facts found and admitted are sufficient to support the judgment. It is insufficient to bring up for review the evidence upon which the findings are based.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rader v. Queen City Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- State v. . LilesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Simmons v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. GreerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- State v. ThorneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. CoxSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Bond v. BondSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.