Legal Opinion
H. N. Bailey & Associates v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 15, 1971No. 266-70PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DURFEE, Judge:
This is a contracts case wherein plaintiff seeks to recover assessed and collected excess reprocurement costs. In addition, plaintiff prays for a declaration that the Government’s termination for default is converted into a termination for the convenience of the Government.
Operation Henhouse is an aerial recovery program that is conducted by the U. S. Air Force as part of our space and missile program. The instant procurement required the production and delivery of manganese bronze pole hooks and manganese bronze loop hooks. These hooks are employed by moving aircraft for the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- D. Joseph Devito, Receiver for Seaview Electric Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- River Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
- Helene Curtis Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Sundstrand Turbo, a Division of Sundstrand Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Miller Elevator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Dale Ingram, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Federal-Mogul Corporation, Petitioner-Cross v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- James Giesler and Luke Coniglio (Doing Business as Central Park Company) v. United States, Defendant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Florida Steel Corporation v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.