Legal Opinion

Gaastra v. Bishop's Lodge Co.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1931No. 3559PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SADLER, J.

The appellant, Bishop’s Lodge Company, a corporation, employed the appellees, Gaastra, Gladding & Johnson, co-partners, as architects to furnish plans for certain improvements to be erected upon the premises of appellant. The contract between the parties called upon appellant to pay to appellees for plans only 3J4 per cent, of the total cost of the building. The appellees furnished plans only, so that this provision for compensation became operative.

The building was constructed in substantial compliance with the plans furnished by the appellees and at a total…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Freeman v. RinakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Lamoreaux v. AnderschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Williamson v. Hotel MelroseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  4. Stephens v. . HicksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  5. Fitzgerald v. WalshWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. RoweSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  2. Allison v. SchulerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Dysart v. YoungbloodNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Christie v. Commercial Casualty Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
  5. Cubit Corp. v. HauslerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API