Legal Opinion

Allison v. Schuler

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1934No. 3939PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BICKLEY, Justice.

Suit was brought by plaintiffs, appellees to foreclose a mechanic’s lien upon property of defendants. The defendants-appellants answering plaintiffs’ complaint sought to defeat the action upon the ground that the claims of lien were not filed within 90 days after the completion of the building as required by statute. Comp. St. 1929, § 82-206. A decree was entered establishing plaintiffs’ liens, and defendants have appealed, and plaintiffs have cross-appealed. The parties will hereafter be referred to as plaintiffs and defendants.

It is the contention of defendants that…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Alberti v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Milliken Bros., Incorporated v. . City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. General Fire Extinguisher Co. v. Schwartz Bros. CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1901
  4. Nichols v. CulverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
  5. James A. C. Tait & Co. v. StrykerOregon Supreme Court · 1926

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Research Park, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Sundance Mechanical & Utility Corp. v. AtlasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Lyda Swinerton Builders, Inc. v. Cathay Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  4. Intermountain Electric, Inc. v. G-A-T Bros. Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. Intermountain Elec., Inc. v. GAT BROS. CONST., INC.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API