Legal Opinion

Dysart v. Youngblood

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1940No. 4466PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MABRY, Justice.

Suit was filed by appellee Youngblood to foreclose a mechanics’ lien against the property of appellant Dysart, consisting ■of a “dry” water well and the land upon which the same was located.

The cause was tried to the court, judgment given appellee and a lien established upon the well, designated as a “structure” within the contemplation of the statute, and the section of land upon which it was located. The theory upon which the land was included was that it was needed for the “convenient use and occupation” of the well. Mrs. Dysart, defendant below, brings this appeal.

Appellant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Western Well Works, Inc. v. California Farms Co.California Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. Hot Springs Plumbing & Heating Co. v. WallaceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Lyons v. HowardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Albuquerque Foundry & MacHine Works v. StoneNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Albuquerque Lumber Co. v. Montevista Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WelshNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. El Paso Electric Co. v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Lembke Construction Co. v. JD Coggins CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Durfee v. ParkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Beall Pipe & Tank Corp. v. Tumac Intermountain, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API