Legal Opinion

Teegarden v. Lewis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1895No. 16,698PublishedCited by 47 opinions

From the Parke Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHackney, J.

— The question for decision in this case arises upon a special verdict, and involves the right of the appellants to retain, as against the appellee, moneys held by them as gifts from the appellee’s intestate.

It was found that the appellants, jointly, had received $4,774.00, and that said John E. Teegarden had received to his separate use $4,093.00. In each instance, where it is found that the appellants received money from the intestate, it is also found that the intestate “was of unsound mind.” For the appellants, it is insisted that the special verdict, in finding that the intestate “was of…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. SpencerIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Burkhart v. GladishIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Conner v. Citizens Street Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Somers v. PumphreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1865

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. First Farmers Bank & Trust Co. v. WhorleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Collins v. DunifonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Westphal v. HeckmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Wiley v. GordonIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Roller v. KlingIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API