Legal Opinion
In Re Marriage of Millet
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 12, 1974No. Civ. 42892PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KAUS, P. J.
This proceeding, the fallout from a dissolution action, is an appeal by husband William B. Millet from a trial court order of May 1973 that he pay wife Bertha B. Millet $338 in attorney’s fees, claimed for services in collecting some $1,100 in unpaid spousal support owed by William.
The March 1971 interlocutory decree had required William to pay Bertha $130 a month or 40 percent of his gross income. The total amount owed for 1971 was $2,625. In March 1972, William still owed $1,065 of this amount. Bertha’s attorney wrote several dunning letters to William’s attorney. William…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Utz v. AureguyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Smith v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Erikson v. SullivanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- De Lima v. De LimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
3Cited by9 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- Balboa Insurance v. AguirreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- In Re Marriage of HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Kapelus v. Newport Equity Funds, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.