Pneumo Abex v. Bessemer and Lake Erie RR Co.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JACKSON, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs initiated this action pursuant to sections 107 and 113 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9607, 9613 (1988 & Supp.1993), as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 (“CERCLA” or “the Act”), and the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201(a) (1994). Plaintiffs seek recovery of costs allegedly incurred in responding to releases or threatened releases of allegedly hazardous substances at or from the Pneumo Abex Superfund Site…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- The State of New York v. Shore Realty Corp. And Donald LeograndeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Monsanto Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Martignetti v. Haigh-Farr, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
- Ninth Avenue Remedial Group v. Allis Chalmers Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1997
- Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1996
- Adhesives Research Inc. v. American Inks & Coatings Corp.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Pneumo Abex Corp. v. Bessemer & Lake Erie RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.