Legal Opinion

Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. v. Mallinckrodt, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided May 6, 1996No. 4:95-cv-02033PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

925 F.Supp. 624 (1996)

LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs,

v.

MALLINCKRODT, INC., et al., Defendants.

No. 4:95-CV-2033 CAS.

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division.

May 6, 1996.

R. Henry Branom, Jr., Jason M. Rugo, Ronald E. Jenkins, Jenkins and Kling, St. Louis, MO, for plaintiffs Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc., Laidlaw Waste Systems (Belleville), Inc.

Richard J. Pautler, Partner, Peper and Martin, St. Louis, MO, for defendants Mallinckrodt, Inc., Mallinckrodt Chemical, Inc.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SHAW, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on a motion to dismiss…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. National Tank Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1982

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bancamerica Commercial Corp. v. Mosher Steel of Kansas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  2. Dannix Painting, LLC v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  3. Dico, Inc. v. Amoco Oil Company, Chevron Chemical Company Monsanto Company Shell Oil Company Bayer CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
  4. Trademark Medical, LLC v. Birchwood Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2014
  5. In Re Genetically Modified Rice LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API