Legal Opinion

Martignetti v. Haigh-Farr, Inc.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 24, 1997PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.

The plaintiffs brought an action in the Superior Court against the defendants, Haigh-Farr, Inc. (Haigh-Farr), and Charles E. Farr (Farr), for damages and costs resulting from the release of hazardous materials on property owned by the plaintiffs in Cambridge.4 The complaint stated claims under the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 (CERCLA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 9601-9675 (1994), and the Massachusetts Oil and Hazardous Material Release Prevention Act, G. L. c. 21E, as well as common law claims for nuisance, strict liability, and negligence. On the…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Key Tronic Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  3. Amoco Oil Company v. Borden, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  4. Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Saraland ApartmentsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Hazen Paper Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Bank v. Thermo Elemental Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  2. Scott v. NG US 1, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  3. Murphy v. Department of CorrectionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  4. Thomas & Betts Corporation v. Alfa Laval, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  5. Black v. Coastal Oil New England, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1998

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API