Legal Opinion
Shouse v. Quinley
California Supreme Court
Decided April 25, 1935No. S. F. 15064PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
We granted a rehearing in this case in order to give further consideration to the problem involved, particularly in connection with the eases of County of Los Angeles v. Rockhold, L. A. No. 14798, ante, p. 192 [44 Pac. (2d) 340], and Islais Co., Ltd., v. Matheson, S. F. No. 15216, post, p. 657 [45 Pac. (2d) 326], S. F. No. 15217, post, p. 762 [45 Pac. (2d) 332], S. F. No. 15221, post, p. 763 [45 Pac. (2d) 332], and S. F. No. 15299, post, p. 764 [45 Pac. (2d) 333], and S. F. No. 15222 [49 Pac. (2d) 821], *S. F. No. 15298 [45 Pac. (2d) 332], and *S. F. No. 15300 [45 Pac. (2d) 333], Upon further…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- W. B. Worthen Co. v. KavanaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- W. B. Worthen Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Chapman v. JocelynCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Des Moines Joint Stock Land Bank v. NordholmSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brown v. FerdonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- West Coast Life Ins. Co. v. Merced Irr. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Loew's Inc. v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- El Camino Irrigation District v. El Camino Land Corp.California Supreme Court · 1938
- Hales v. SnowdenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.