Legal Opinion

Atwood v. Benson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 30, 1926No. 1 Div. 416PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The suit is upon a check, payment of which was refused by the bank for want of funds. The action is by the payee against the maker or drawer.

The sole question presented for deei sion is whether the complaint is subject to demurrer for failure to aver the check, or debt evidenced thereby, is still unpaid.

“A check is a bill of exchange drawn on a bank payable on demand. Except as herein otherwise provided, the provisions of this chapter applicable to a bill of exchange payable on demand apply to a check.” Code 1923, § 9203.

The maker of negotiable paper engages that he will pay it according to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woodward Iron Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  2. Masterson v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Pollak v. WinterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  4. Pollak v. WinterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Daniel Drug Co. v. Collier Drug Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deal v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Adams v. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Jackson v. Chemical Nat. BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API