Legal Opinion

Daniel Drug Co. v. Collier Drug Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 13, 1922No. 8 Div. 450PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMeCLELLAN, J.

The plaintiff (appellee) sued appellants on a justice’s judgment rendered in plaintiff’s favor in January, 1916, against appellants. The trial was by the court without jury. The complaint declared on the judgment, alleging as well that “said judgment is wholly unpaid.” The plaintiff introduced the justice’s docket and the judgment here declared on, and this was all the evidence presented on the trial.

It is insisted that error affects the judgment under review, because the plaintiff made no proof that the justice’s judgment was unpaid, as alleged in the complaint. In a complaint declaring on a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Murphy v. Citizens' BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
  2. Masterson v. MatthewsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  3. Campbell v. CrossIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Pollak v. WinterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  5. Pollak v. WinterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buckner v. GravesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  2. Atwood v. BensonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  3. Rutledge v. RutledgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API