Legal Opinion

Deal v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 25, 1932No. 4 Div. 653PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.

Suit on check by payee against drawer. The Code furnishes no form for such a suit. A check is, in every legal sense, a bill of exchange. As stated in the case of Atwood v. Benson, 215 Ala. 72, 109 So. 361: “There is no form prescribed for suit by the payee against the maker or drawer' of a check. In some respects the action is more analogous to a suit on a note or bond by the payee against the maker than to an action by an indorsee of a bill of exchange. The general rule is everywhere recognized that payment is an affirmative defense.”

The check imports a consideration, which, however, may be…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Bull v. Bank of KassonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Bickford v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Heartt v. RhodesIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Born v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Griffin v. KempIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Steele v. VandersliceArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Mason v. BlaytonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  3. Scott v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
  4. Gooch v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  5. State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API