Deal v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the CourtKnight, J.
Suit on check by payee against drawer. The Code furnishes no form for such a suit. A check is, in every legal sense, a bill of exchange. As stated in the case of Atwood v. Benson, 215 Ala. 72, 109 So. 361: “There is no form prescribed for suit by the payee against the maker or drawer' of a check. In some respects the action is more analogous to a suit on a note or bond by the payee against the maker than to an action by an indorsee of a bill of exchange. The general rule is everywhere recognized that payment is an affirmative defense.”
The check imports a consideration, which, however, may be…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Bull v. Bank of KassonSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Bickford v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
- Heartt v. RhodesIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
- Born v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Griffin v. KempIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Steele v. VandersliceArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Mason v. BlaytonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Scott v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948
- Gooch v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
- State v. FergusonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.