Dizick v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison Supervision
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, P. J.
Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision (board) denying his request for a parole consideration hearing. As explained below, we conclude that the board erred in determining that petitioner will not be eligible for parole consideration until 2038. We therefore reverse and remand the board’s order for further proceedings.
Petitioner was convicted on two counts each of attempted aggravated murder, first-degree assault, and first-degree robbery. Those crimes occurred on January 11,1993. In an earlier iteration of this case, petitioner appealed, arguing…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Gaynor v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. HartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- Rise v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. CoburnCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. DizickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017