Legal Opinion

State v. Coburn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 5, 1997No. 91C-20760; CA A91829PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant appeals the sentence imposed following a remand to the sentencing court from the post-conviction court. We reverse and remand.

In April 1992, defendant was convicted in a jury trial of two counts of kidnaping in the first degree, one count of rape in the first degree, two counts of sodomy in the first degree and one count of sexual abuse in the first degree. Pursuant to ORS 161.725 to ORS 161.737, the court sentenced defendant as a dangerous offender. Under those statutes, a dangerous offender sentence has determinate and indeterminate parts. See State v. Davis, 315 Or 484, 494-95,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerOregon Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. MorganOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. State Ex Rel. O'Leary v. JacobsOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. FroemblingOregon Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. MetzCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. State v. WorthCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. Brock v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. IsomCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API