Legal Opinion

Rise v. Board of Parole

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1987No. CA A39343; SC S34089PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*387GILLETTE, J.

This case involves the effect, if any, that a plea agreement between a criminal defendant and a district attorney can have on the Board of Parole’s subsequent decisions regarding the defendant’s parole date. The Board in the present case determined that it was not “bound” by the terms of such a plea agreement, and the Court of Appeals affirmed without opinion. Rise v. Board of Parole, 84 Or App 741, 735 P2d 380 (1987). We hold that the Board was not bound by the terms of the plea agreement and that it did not err in refusing to enforce the agreement. Accordingly, we affirm.

Petition…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Price v. Board of ParoleOregon Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  2. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Mannelin v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services BranchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  4. State v. TannehillOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Flowers v. Board of Parole & Post-Prison SupervisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API