Legal Opinion
United States v. BNP Paribas SA
District Court, S.D. Texas
Decided August 6, 2012No. Civil Action No. H-11-3718PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SIM LAKE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, the United States of America, brings this action against defendants, BNP Paribas SA, BNP Paribas North America, BNP Paribas Houston Agency' (collectively “BNPP defendants”), and Jovenal Miranda Cruz, under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729, et seq., and for unjust enrichment and payment by mistake. Pending before the court are the Motion to Dismiss the Complaint by Defendants BNP Paribas, BNP Paribas North America, Inc., and BNP Paribas Houston Agency (Docket Entry No. 22), and Defendant Jovenal Miranda Cruz’s Motion…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Hamdi v. RumsfeldSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States ex rel. Carter v. Halliburton Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Guerrero v. Total Renal Care, Inc.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2013
- United States Ex Rel. Shemesh v. CA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- United States v. Planned Parenthood Gulf Coast, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.