Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Shemesh v. CA, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2009-1600PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, United States District Judge
Plaintiff-relator Dani Shemesh (“relator”) brings this qui tam action under the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq., on behalf of the United States against defendant CA, Inc. (“CA”). Defendant now moves to dismiss relator’s second amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6). (See Def.’s Mem. In Supp. of Mot. to Dismiss, Jun. 16, 2014 [ECF No. 56] (“Def.’s Mem.”).) For the following reasons, the motion to dismiss is granted in part and denied in part.
BACKGROUND
Relator worked…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Dyncorp International, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States Ex Rel. Morsell v. Symantec Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- United States Ex Rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- United States ex rel. Bierman v. Orthofix International, N.V.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Landis v. Tailwind Sports CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.