Legal Opinion

KRONOVITTER v. Doyle

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 1, 2012No. AC 31799PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SCHALLER, J.

In this action for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff Gladys Kronovitter 1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a trial by jury, in favor of the defendants, Richard Doyle and Kelly Fitch. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) instructed the jury to consider the elements of certain statutory infractions in relation to the element of probable cause, (2) admitted testimony from an expert witness without prior disclosure or a proper foundation and (3) admitted evidence pertaining to an in rem proceeding. We affirm the judgment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mulligan v. RiouxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  2. Harris v. Bradley Memorial Hospital & Health Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
  3. Arnone v. Town of EnfieldConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
  4. Godwin v. Danbury Eye Physicians & Surgeons, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. Dinan v. MarchandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ray Weiner, LLC v. ConneryConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Trujillo v. ChekasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API