Legal Opinion
Arnone v. Town of Enfield
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 23, 2003No. AC 22265PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
The defendant1 town of Enfield appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after the jury’s verdict, in favor of the plaintiff, Thomas Amone. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) denied its motion to set aside the verdict, and (2) granted the plaintiffs motion for attorney’s fees and costs associated with expert witness fees. We affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. From 1983 until 1996, the defendant employed the plaintiff in its water pollution…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- A.R. Peter Lafond v. General Physics Services CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Carrol v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Sturman v. SochaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Jaffe v. State Department of HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1949
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Northeast Ct. Economic Alliance, Inc. v. ATC PartnershipSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Wyszomierski v. SiracusaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Smith v. AndrewsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Whitaker v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
- Bridgeport Harbour Place I, LLC v. GanimConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.