Legal Opinion
Trujillo v. Chekas
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 18, 2012No. AC 33601Published
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The plaintiff, Jose Trujillo, appeals from the judgment of the trial court, rendered in favor of the defendant state of Connecticut.1 In this personal injury action, the plaintiff claims that the court abused *677its discretion by admitting into evidence the fact that the plaintiff had been compensated for lost wages in violation of the collateral source rale. See Baystate Moving Systems, Inc. v. Bowman, 24 Conn. App. 531, 533-34, 590 A.2d 462, cert. denied, 220 Conn. 904, 593 A.2d 969 (1991). We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record reveals the following facts and procedural…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- GEORGE J. v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- State v. MorganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- State v. George J.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Madsen v. GatesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Baystate Moving Systems, Inc. v. BowmanConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.