Shurtz v. Foster & Kleiser Co.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ST. SURE, District Judge.
This is an action for damages under the act of July 2, 1890, Sherman Anti-Trust Act 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 — 7, 15 note, and the act of October 15, 1914, Clayton Act 38 Stat. 730, charging a conspiracy to monopolize and restrain trade in interstate commerce, as related to the business of outdoor advertising in the states of California, Oregon, Washington, and elsewhere in the United States.
The following descriptive sub-headings contained in the forty-five page complaint will give some idea of its contents: “The Parties”; “General Description of the Business of Outdoor…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Foster & Kleiser Co. v. Special Site Sign Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- Gerli v. Silk Ass'n of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
- Alexander Milburn Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1926
- Ebeling v. Foster & Kleiser Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1935
3Cited by6 opinions
- Maltz v. SaxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
- Trecker v. Manning Implement, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1976
- Society of European Stage Authors & Composers, Inc. v. WCAU Broadcasting Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
- Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd.District Court, N.D. California · 1948
- Hadden v. Rumsey Products, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.