Legal Opinion
Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 22, 1948No. 27646PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROCHE, Chief Judge.
Plaintiffs bring this treble damage action under the Federal Anti-Trust Laws, 15 U.S.C.A. § 15 and 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1 and 2, to recover $15,000,000.00 for damages alleged to have been sustained by them as a result of a general conspiracy on the part of the defendants, unlawfully and in violation of the Sherman and Clayton Acts, to monopolize and restrain trade in the borax industry. •
Plaintiffs allege that this said conspiracy came into existence in 1929 and continued in force up to and through the date of the commencement of this action, September 11, 1947. Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. City of AtlantaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Pashley v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Fleitmann Ex Rel. Stockholders of the Consolidated Street Lighting Co. v. Welsbach Street Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Barnes Coal Corp. v. Retail Coal Merchants Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
- Burnham Chemical Co. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Suckow Borax Mines Consolidated, Inc. v. Borax Consolidated, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Coleman v. Cannon Oil Co.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 1992
- Houlihan v. Anderson-Stokes, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1977
- Trecker v. Manning Implement, Inc.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 1976
- SM Arnold, Inc. v. Union Carbide Corp.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1980