Legal Opinion
Maltz v. Sax
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 26, 1943No. 8096PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVANS, Circuit Judge.
This action was brought to recover treble damages from defendants who allegedly have combined and conspired in violation of Section 1, Title 15, U.S.C.A. (commonly known as the Sherman Anti-Trust Act, as amended by the Clayton Act), to restrain commerce. Plaintiff asserts that he is the victim of said unlawful combination and conspiracy on the part of the defendants and has been damaged in the sum of $15,-000, which should be multiplied three times as authorized by Section 15 of this Title. (Sec. 15, Title 15 U.S.C.A.)
Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint on the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Morton Salt Co. v. G. S. Suppiger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- United States v. Cooper Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Continental Wall Paper Co. v. Louis Voight & Sons Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- The Flintkote Company, a Corporation v. Elmer Lysfjord and Walter R. Waldron, Doing Business as Aabeta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Karseal Corporation v. Richfield Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Albert E. Kuehnert v. Texstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Burnham Chemical Co. v. Borax Consolidated, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1948
- Waldron v. British Petroleum Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1964
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.