Legal Opinion

In re the Risk Level Determination of R.B.P.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 5, 2002No. C4-01-808PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

By writ of certiorari, relator challenges the Administrative Law Judge’s order affirming the End of Confinement Review Committee’s classification of him as a risk level III arguing (1) it was clearly erroneous because the End of Confinement Review Committee exceeded its authority under the statute by assigning him to a risk level two levels higher than the level based on his Sex Offender Screening Tool score; and (2) the evidence does not support the determination that relator should be assigned a risk level III.

FACTS

The End of Confinement Review Committee (ECRC) had…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. In re the Risk Level Determination of C.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. People v. Lombardo, New York County Courts1996
  4. Weber v. HvassCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Commitment of SimonsIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re the Risk Level Determination of S.S.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
  3. In re the Risk Level Determination of D.W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  4. In re the Risk Level Determination of M.D.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  5. First National Bank v. Profit Pork, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API