Legal Opinion
In re the Risk Level Determination of D.W.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 9, 2009No. A08-1532PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BJORKMAN, Judge.
In this appeal from the decision of two administrative law judges (ALJs) affirming his risk-level determination, relator argues that he is not “about to be released from confinement” within the meaning of Minn. Stat. § 244.052, and therefore may not be assigned a risk level. Because the ALJs did not err in interpreting the statute, we affirm.
FACTS
In 1992, relator D.W. was committed to the Minnesota Department of Human Services (the DHS) as a sexual psychopathic personality. He is in the Minnesota Sex Offender Program (MSOP) in St. Peter. By September 2007, relator had…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hans Hagen Homes, Inc. v. City of MinnetristaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2007
- Greene v. Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
- In Re the Alexandria Lake Area Sanitary District NPDES/SDS Permit No. MN0040738Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- In re the Risk Level Determination of C.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
- County of Hennepin v. LevineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Minnesota Voters Alliance, Relators v. Anoka-Hennepin School District, Minnesota Office of Administrative HearingsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- In Re DwCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009