Legal Opinion

In Re the Risk Level Determination of S.S.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 16, 2007No. A06-36PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROSS, Judge.

This appeal arises from an administrative law judge’s order affirming a decision by the department of corrections’ end-of-confinement review committee to designate S.S., a female convicted of criminal sexual conduct, a risk-level-III predatory offender. S.S. argues that the committee failed to follow the requirements of Minnesota Statutes section 244.052 in making its risk-level determination. Because the procedure the committee followed to assess S.S.did not comply with the statutory requirement to apply a weighted risk-assessment tool, we reverse and remand for a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HoytSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. In re the Risk Level Determination of C.M.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  3. In re the Risk Level Determination of R.B.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Doe v. Sex Offender Registry BoardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
  2. In re the Risk Level Determination of D.W.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  3. In Re DwCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  4. In the Matter of the Risk Level Determination of: L. R. O.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API