Legal Opinion
In re the Risk Level Determination of M.D.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 9, 2009No. A08-1363PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STONEBURNER, Judge.
In this review by writ of certiorari, relator argues that because he was released from a Minnesota correctional facility to a Wisconsin correctional facility upon completion of his Minnesota sentence, he was not “released from confinement” within the meaning of Minn.Stat. § 244.052, subd. 3(a), and therefore, the Department of Corrections lacked authority to conduct a risk-level assessment and assign him a risk level when he was released from the Minnesota correctional facility.
FACTS
Relator M.D. was committed to the Minnesota Department of Corrections (DOC) after…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. WukawitzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- State v. BluhmSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- In re the Risk Level Determination of R.B.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. LilleskovCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re MdCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- In Re the Risk Level Determination of G.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009