Legal Opinion
In re the Risk Level Determination of C.M.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 2, 1998No. C7-97-1722PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIS, Judge.
Relator C.M.1 appeals from his classification as a level III sex offender. We conclude that the interpretation of Minn.Stat. § 244.052, subd. 1(4) (1996), under which relator was classified as a sex offender is an unconstitutional violation of due process and therefore reverse.
FACTS
In March 1993, relator C.M. stayed in Waseca for two days with C.B., his ex-girlfriend. On March 4, C.B. evicted relator. Late that evening, relator returned, intoxicated, to C.B.’s apartment. When C.B. refused to let him in, relator broke down the door. Using physical force, relator ordered…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Boutin v. LaFleurSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- In Re MeyerWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- In re the Risk Level Determination of R.B.P.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- State v. H.A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- Barry v. St. Anthony-New Brighton Independent School District 282Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.