Legal Opinion

Duffin v. Idaho Crop Improvement Ass'n

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1995No. 20135, 20260PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TROUT, Justice.

The action giving rise to this appeal was initiated by the appellants, Eric and Melanie Duffin, and involves the sale of certified seed potatoes.

I

BACKGROUND

The sale of certified seed in Idaho is subject to statutory regulation. The responsibility for administering the certification program is granted to the University of Idaho (UI). I.C. § 22-425. 1 UI has, pursuant to I.C. § 22-429, delegated the day-to-day management of the program to the Idaho Crop Improvement Association (ICIA), a private, non-profit corporation organized under the Cooperative Marketing Act (I.C. §§ 22-2601…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  2. Clark v. International Harvester Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1978
  3. G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Anderson v. City of PocatelloIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Sterling v. BloomIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Giles v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Christensen Family Trust v. ChristensenIdaho Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Aardema v. U.S. Dairy Systems, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Millenkamp v. Davisco Foods International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Ramerth v. HartIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API