Legal Opinion
Korman v. Walking Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 28, 2007No. Civil Action 07-1557PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Marlene Korman 1 brings this putative class action against Defendant The Walking Company for alleged violations of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003 (FACTA). In relevant part, FACTA, a subset of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), requires retailers, on the electronically printed receipts provided to customers, to eliminate specified portions of the customers’ credit card information.
Below is a recitation of the allegations in the complaint, which, while simple, both mirror the allegations in numerous com plaints…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Whitaker v. Herr Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Padilla v. GMAC Mortgage Corp. (In Re Padilla)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Goode v. Lexisnexis Risk & Information Analytics Group, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Martin v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2011
- McCabe v. Daimler AGDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2013
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.