Legal Opinion

Gartner v. Roth

California Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1945No. L. A. 18944PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

In this proceeding plaintiffs sought, and were denied, mandamus to compel the defendant auditor and the defendant treasurer of the county of San Bernardino to issue an estimate of, and permit, redemption of certain real property upon payment of tax delinquencies and penalties as computed by said county officials.

In 1941 the Legislature provided by section 3511.3 of the Revenue and Taxation Code that “On and after June 1, 1942, and prior to January 1, 1947, on execution of the deed to the State, the right of redemption is terminated as to all property . . . [with an exception not here…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Krause v. RarityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Miller v. Mun. Court of L. A.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Callet v. AliotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  4. O'Dea v. CookCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Mannheim v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Texas Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. In Re KarpfCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  4. County of San Diego v. MilotzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  5. Allen v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API