In re Estate of Osborn
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco settling the accounts of executors. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.
Edmond Saul and the appellant, William E. Straut, were appointed executors of the will of William G. Osborn, and entered upon the discharge of their duties October 28, 1867. The value of the estate for which they accounted was $32,667.20. Claims were presented, amounting in all to only $1,560.74. Nearly all of the heirs and devisees were non-residents, and constituted Hon. Seth M. Richmond, of New York, their attorney in fact, with authority “to collect, receive, sue for, demand, and give acquittances for all legacies, moneys, and property due and payable from the executors and trustees of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Adair v. . BrimmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Ormiston v. . OlcottNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- In re Estate of SandersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- Croft v. . WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Douglass v. SatterleeNew York Supreme Court · 1814
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Carver v. CarmichaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Gaver v. EarlyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Hewlwtt v. BeedeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
- Ex Parte RushSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.