Hewlwtt v. Beede
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order denying a new trial. Ansel Smith, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBuckles, J.
On June 23, 1893, Alonzo McCloud a resident of San Joaquin county, California, died testate, and in due time his will was admitted to probate and the court appointed B. D. Baldwin and Samuel Hewlett, executors. Each, qualifying, gave separate bonds, each in the sum of $25,000. The sureties on the bond of B. D. Baldwin were J. D. Mc-Dougald, Joseph H. Swain, Mary A. Baldwin, Joseph Fyfé, and W. M. S. Beede; each of said sureties qualifying in the sum of $10,000. The sureties on the bond of the said Samuel Hewlett were Henry Meyers for $10,000, L. Hewlett for $10,000, G. W. Trahern for $10,000,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harrigan v. Home Life Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1900
- County of Glenn v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- County of San Luis Obispo v. FarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Elder v. KutnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Heidt v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bullis v. Security Pacific National BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Southern Surety Co. v. TessumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- City of Pueblo v. KurtzSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
- Crumrine v. DizdarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Postlethwaite v. MinorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914