Carver v. Carmichael
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County settling the final account of an administratrix. William O. Minor, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
The administratrix appeals from an order settling her final account, in which the court denied her right to any commissions, and charged her with the sum of $535.72, as cash on hand, “said sum being the amount found due said estate from Ann A. Carver in the settlement of the action of McHenry v. Carver et al.” No other items are involved in this appeal.
1. Is appellant entitled to commissions in the sum charged, or in any sum? The value of the property, as shown by the inventory and appraisement, was $33,248.03, and the commissions charged were based upon that sum, computed at the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Estate of HinckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- In re the estate of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- In the Matter of Estate of SimmonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- In re Estate of OsbornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
3Cited by20 opinions
- Estate of JohnstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Stiebel v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- In Re Estate of ElizaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Security First National Bank v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- Pitcher v. LampmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.