Legal Opinion

Hiebert v. Howell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1938No. 6608PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAilshie, J.

Appellant Howell had been continuously engaged in the business of buying standing timber in Shoshone county, near Cataldo in Kootenai county and at other places, and of selling logs and contracting the logging out to logging contractors. Henry, David and Gus Hiebert and Frank Fast, a partnership, owned real and personal property including logging trucks, trailers, caterpillars and all equipment for skidding and hauling logs. David and Gus handled the trucks and Henry operated the caterpillar; Fast worked on a jammer.

During the early summer of 1937 the brothers had been working for wages for…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Levangie's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  2. Taylor v. Blackwell Lumber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Angell v. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. London Guarantee & Accident Co. v. SterlingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  5. Burchett v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1927

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bowser v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Gifford v. NottinghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Moon v. ErvinIdaho Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Beutler v. MacGregor Triangle CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Brown v. FoxSupreme Court of Virginia · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API