Legal Opinion
Moon v. Ervin
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided February 5, 1943No. 7032PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDunlap, J.
In June, 1940, Dr. Eugene Schreiber, one of the respondents, and cross-appellant, Tim Ervin, entered into and signed a written contract whereby the cross-appellant agreed to erect for Dr. Schreiber a residence in Caldwell. This agreement, together with the attached specification, had been prepared by respondent Home Lumber & Coal Co., a corporation (for brevity hereinafter referred to as Company), as had also the plans for the building.
Appellant Moon was employed by Ervin, with others, as a laborer on the construction job, and there is no evidence that he, or the other laborers, received…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Commercial Lumber Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Brown v. St. Joseph Lead Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1938
- Artificial Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. WaltzIndiana Court of Appeals · 1925
- E. D. Bedwell Coal Co. v. State Industrial Com.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Hiebert v. HowellIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Ingram v. DeereTexas Supreme Court · 2009
- Martha M. Kirk, an Adult, and Kenneth William Kirk, a Minor, Who Sues by His Guardian Ad Litem, Martha M. Kirk v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Tucker v. Union Oil Co. of CaliforniaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- House v. Mine Safety Appliances Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Gifford v. NottinghamIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.