Legal Opinion

Richards Irrigation Co. v. Karren

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided August 2, 1994No. 920407-CAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BENCH, Judge:

Third-party plaintiff Rock Products Company (Rock Products) appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of its causes of action against the State under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

FACTS

Richards Irrigation Company (Richards) entered into a contract with the Utah Division of Water Resources (Division) to construct an irrigation system. The contract required the Division to pay for eighty-five percent of the cost of the irrigation system and to engineer and supervise its construction. Appellant Ves A. Karren, doing…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Standiford v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hansen v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Rocky Mountain Thrift Stores, Inc. v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Salt Lake County v. Holliday Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Ryan Harvey, Rocks Off, Inc. v. Ute Indian Tribe of the UintahUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Scott v. Universal Sales, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Youren v. Tintic School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2004
  5. Cline v. State, Division of Child & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API