Legal Opinion

Youren v. Tintic School District

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided February 20, 2004No. 20021044-CAPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION

DAVIS, Judge:

¶ 1 Debra Youren appeals a trial court order dismissing both causes of action in her complaint with prejudice. We affirm.

¶ 2 Youren argues that the trial court erred by dismissing her first cause of action under the claim preclusion branch of res judicata. 1 “The doctrine of res judicata serves the important policy of preventing previously litigated issues from being reliti-gated. Res judicata encompasses two distinct doctrines: claim preclusion and issue preclusion.” Miller v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., 2002 UT 6,¶ 57, 44 P.3d 663 (quotations and citations omitted).…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yapp v. Excel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. MacRis & Associates, Inc. v. Neways, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Miller v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Milliner v. Elmer Fox and Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Copper State Thrift and Loan v. BrunoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Oman v. Davis School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Ryan Harvey, Rocks Off, Inc. v. Ute Indian Tribe of the UintahUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Cline v. State, Division of Child & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
  4. Yedidag v. Roswell Clinic Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Banner Bank v. Robertson (In re Robertson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API