Youren v. Tintic School District
Court of Appeals of Utah
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
DAVIS, Judge:
¶ 1 Debra Youren appeals a trial court order dismissing both causes of action in her complaint with prejudice. We affirm.
¶ 2 Youren argues that the trial court erred by dismissing her first cause of action under the claim preclusion branch of res judicata. 1 “The doctrine of res judicata serves the important policy of preventing previously litigated issues from being reliti-gated. Res judicata encompasses two distinct doctrines: claim preclusion and issue preclusion.” Miller v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co., 2002 UT 6,¶ 57, 44 P.3d 663 (quotations and citations omitted).…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Yapp v. Excel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- MacRis & Associates, Inc. v. Neways, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2000
- Miller v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
- Milliner v. Elmer Fox and Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1974
- Copper State Thrift and Loan v. BrunoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Oman v. Davis School DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Ryan Harvey, Rocks Off, Inc. v. Ute Indian Tribe of the UintahUtah Supreme Court · 2017
- Cline v. State, Division of Child & Family ServicesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2005
- Yedidag v. Roswell Clinic Corp.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2013
- Banner Bank v. Robertson (In re Robertson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.