Hansen v. Salt Lake County
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Justice:
Plaintiff Phil L. Hansen filed suit against defendant Salt Lake County alleging that the County damaged or destroyed various improvements Hansen made to his property near the Big Cottonwood Canyon streambed. The County admitted that it had removed two bridges and various materials from the streambed during implementation of its flood control program but moved to dismiss, claiming immunity under the Utah Governmental Immunity Act, Utah Code Ann. §§ 63-30-1 to -38 (1989), and that no cause of action could be maintained under the inverse condemnation section of the Utah…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Condemarin v. University HospitalUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Colman v. Utah State Land BoardUtah Supreme Court · 1990
- Standiford v. Salt Lake City Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1980
- Little v. Utah State Division of Family ServicesUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Greenhalgh v. Payson CityUtah Supreme Court · 1975
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Ex Parte CranmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- Retherford v. AT & T Communications of the Mountain States, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1992
- Sullivan v. Scoular Grain Co. of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1993
- NELSON BY AND THROUGH STUCKMAN v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1996
- Laney v. Fairview CityUtah Supreme Court · 2002
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.