Tatum v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SPEAR, J.
Pursuant to this court’s granting of certification, the petitioner appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He claims that, contrary to the court’s decision, his trial counsel was ineffective because, at the petitioner’s criminal trial, counsel failed (1) to call three witnesses whose testimony would have been helpful to the defense, and (2) to investigate and present an alibi defense. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
In State v. Tatum, 219 Conn. 721, 595 A.2d 322 (1991), our Supreme Court on direct appeal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Copas v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. TatumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- State v. TaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Aillon v. MeachumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Baillargeon v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Morant v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Norton v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Ramos v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- Tatum v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.