Legal Opinion

Ramos v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 22, 2002No. AC 20315PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FLYNN, J.

This appeal arises from the habeas court’s denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The *656petitioner, Wilfredo M. Ramos, claims that the habeas court improperly found (1) that he pleaded guilty voluntarily and (2) that he had effective assistance of counsel during the sentencing phase of his case. The petitioner contends that “gross misadvice” from his counsel coupled with the retroactive application of Megan’s Law1 renders his guilty plea involuntary. He also alleges that his counsel was ineffective in failing to offer more mitigating evidence at the sentencing hearing…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. BuhlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
  2. State v. WheatlandConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. Corona v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. Davis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  5. James v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API