Legal Opinion
Baillargeon v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 29, 2002No. AC 20729PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, C. J.
The petitioner, Richard BaiUargeon, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court dismissing his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. He claims that the habeas court improperly (1) held that neither his trial nor sentencing counsel was ineffective, (2) applied the Strickland1 standard to his attempt to withdraw his plea and (3) failed to address his claim that the state lacked a factual basis for charging him with the crime to which he pleaded guilty. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
According to the factual statement made by the state at his sentencing hearing,…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Copas v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Lewis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Ricks v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- State v. LopezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Hunnicutt v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- Corbett v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.